We Fix Websites Built with AI

When an AI-Built Website Fails

The story is almost always the same. You described your idea to Lovable, v0 or Bolt, and two days later you had a working website. It looked great in the demo. Then real users arrived: someone's payment didn't go through, the signup form started rejecting valid emails, and a stranger on the internet pointed out that your API key was visible in the page source. The tool that built the site can't explain what went wrong, and every new prompt seems to break something else.

This isn't a reason to regret using AI. It's just where these tools stop. They optimize for a working demo, not for the hostile reality of the open internet - bots probing your forms, users entering data nobody predicted, traffic spikes at two in the morning. Our AI code security audit exists because the gap between 'runs on my screen' and 'safe to run in public' is where almost every AI-built project gets hurt.

Free Security Code Review

We start by reading the code, not rewriting it. The free review takes a few days and produces a plain list: what's dangerous, what's broken, what's fine. Then we fix in that order - exposed credentials and open database rules first, then the bugs your users actually hit, then performance and cleanup. You see the priorities and the price before any work starts.

Rebuilding Architecture and Project Takeover

Sometimes part of the code does need to go. Honest answer: AI tools occasionally produce architecture that costs more to untangle than to redo. When that happens, we rebuild only that part and keep the rest - your design, your content and your working features stay. And if the previous developer or agency has vanished along with the project, our project takeover service covers recovering access and getting the code back under control.

Typical Flaws by AI Tool

Different tools break in different ways. Lovable projects usually arrive as React with Supabase, and the problems live in database rules and auth. v0 and Bolt generate Next.js with components duplicated in ten places. Code written with Cursor or Claude Code can be anything, which usually means half-finished features nobody remembers asking for. We've handled all of them; the checklist is the same, the findings differ.

Maintenance, Pricing and Timelines

Once the site is stable, it's worth keeping it that way. Most of our rescue clients move to a small maintenance plan: monitoring, backups, dependency updates, and someone to call when something looks off. If the site also feels slow, speed optimization is usually the next quick win - AI-generated frontends tend to ship far more JavaScript than they need.

Timing: the review takes 2-5 days, and most fixes ship within one to three weeks. Prices start at €600 for small repairs; a full rescue typically lands between €1,400 and €4,000. Send the repository or just the URL - we sign NDAs routinely, and we've seen worse code than yours.